Re: PAPT Package Status
On February 11, 2018 6:15:43 PM UTC, Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
>While thinking about the migration of PAPT to git/salsa, I decided to
>take a
>quick look at the size of the task. Currently there are 199 packages
>in the
>PAPT svn.
>
>Of them, 27 have not been touched since jwilk did a mass commit for
>"Use
>canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields" four years ago. I suspect some of
>these are
>good candidates for orphaning (need a real human uploader/maintainer in
>
>addition to the team) or rm. If someone was interested in working on
>cleaning
>things up, those might be a decent place to start.
>
>Of these, a stack aren't in Debian anymore (part of dd-list output):
Actually, that's not quite right. They aren't in unstable anymore.
>E: Unknown package: trac-batchmodify
>E: Unknown package: harvestman
>E: Unknown package: zine
>E: Unknown package: mpdris
>E: Unknown package: pybackpack
>E: Unknown package: viridian
>E: Unknown package: google-sitemapgen
>E: Unknown package: emesene
>E: Unknown package: trac-git
>E: Unknown package: indywiki
>E: Unknown package: canto
>E: Unknown package: upnp-inspector
>
>dd-list of the remaining packages attached. I did no checking to see
>if these
>are in good shape or not (I recently uploaded a package that would have
>been
>on this list except upstream woke up after 6 years and released a new
>version,
>so just because it hasn't been touched, doesn't make it bad.
>
>Scott K
Reply to: