On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 05:50:54PM +0200, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> I introduced an additional binary package for this script because I thought
> people cold have found it useful. But, right, everything considered I should
> better drop it.
Wait a second before dropping this..
What would be the downside of having it in a separate package? I
concur that the "py-" prefix strikes as odd, but I otherwise generally
recommend keeping /usr/bin/* stuff out of python-* packages, while
keeping in the latter only the python module, for a bunch of reasons.
Surely I'm not the only one who would consider moving the file back to
python3-cpuinfo a step backward…
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature