Re: PyPI source or github source?

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PyPI source or github source?
From: Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:21:51 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20170313172151.68ce7b2a@subdivisions.wooz.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87bmt4ho80.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>
References: <[🔎] 85r323gw48.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <[🔎] 874lyzi6d9.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <[🔎] 20170313121143.25a689f1@subdivisions.wooz.org> <[🔎] 87bmt4ho80.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>

On Mar 14, 2017, at 08:16 AM, Brian May wrote:

>I just found another one: python-ledger. Unfortunately in this case,
>Python packages are also bundled with the C code (libraries and client).

Not entirely relevant, but pyparted also contained C code, but its mainline
does support Python 3.

-Barry

Attachment: pgpvHA4DPMyKw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
- PyPI source or github source?
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: PyPI source or github source?
  - From: Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>
- Re: PyPI source or github source?
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: PyPI source or github source?
Next by Date: Re: PyPI source or github source?
Previous by thread: Re: PyPI source or github source?
Next by thread: Re: PyPI source or github source?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread