* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Fri, 6 Oct 2017
08:34:04 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
>
> +1
>
> In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (intent to
> package) for Adam's python-magic as https://bugs.debian.org/877849
Did I misunderstand
| Ideally the upstream file package would take it over.
?
Perhaps a little bit early, because we didn't see Adams solution, but I would
like to understand the goals. Am I right that the intentions are
- Add a compatibility layer to python-magic[file] to support the feature set of
python-magic[pypi]
- Provide in some way on Pypi the same featureset for file-magic and
python-magic
?
If this would be the case, in my understanding there wouldn't be any need for an
ITP or transition, but just the possibility for (Debian) packages needing
python-magic[pypi) to use the then compatible python-magic[file].
Best regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Behrle
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71 7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6
Attachment:
pgpWOn3Gjnz6H.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP