[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Naming convention for -doc package



Currently lintian is applying the new-package-should-not-package-python2-module tag to documentation packages as well.

I've filed a bug report with a patch:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855243

Christopher Hoskin

On 11 February 2017 at 01:51, Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> wrote:
Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> writes:

> So given your criteria above, you would choose:
>
> - python3-pytestqt
> - python-pytestqt-doc
>
> Am I correct?

That allows a future ‘python4-pytestqt’ to use the same documentation.

So far, the overwhelming pattern is that upstream's documentation does
not come in separate versions for different Python platforms. It's the
same Py.test QT documentation, regardless of Python version.

The corresponding Debian packages of documentation should not be named
by any Python version, either.

> Is everyone happy with that?

I am.

--
 \         “Smoking cures weight problems. Eventually.” —Steven Wright |
  `\                                                                   |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>



Reply to: