Re: Naming convention for -doc package
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> wrote:
> So based on #829744, both pytest-qt and
> pytest-xvfb, which are new packages, do not produce a corresponding
> Python 2 binary package.
my point is: this looks wrong and premature, and should have been
discussed more broadly and not just lamby submitting a bug report to
lintian, and thus getting it already kind-of-official
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
Reply to: