Re: Packaging new version of ZODB (Zope Object Database)
Le 11/02/16 à 23:51, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> On Nov 02, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>> This has already been discussed but all the packages in pkg-zope SVN
>> repository will have to be moved to python-{modules, apps} repositories
>> (because there is almost no activity on pkg-zope and most modules are
>> used independently of Zope anyway) and we should use debian-python ML
>> for the same reason, so yes, please use debian-python ML and commit
>> everything to python-{modules, apps} repositories.
>
> +1. I do still touch some of the ztk packages and would dearly love to ditch
> svn, but just haven't had the time to think about a proper migration. Should
> we just admit defeat and do on-demand conversions, preserving history if
> possible but not worrying about it too much?
>
> And then what about just using gbp and ignoring git-dpm? The latter still
> kind of works but we know it's a dead-end. Anybody looked at dgit? Is that
> a useful option?
I'm used to gbp. I don't know git-dpm (or I forgot after seeing I would not like?)
Not sure if all python-modules repositories are like persistent, but for me, mixing Debian work with imported tarballs in the same branch is terrible. When possible, I prefer to fork the upstream repository, otherwise no upstream source at all.
Actually, I already use git-svn+gbp locally for zodb (I have a debian symlink between the upstream and debian repos; that even works with patches), so it's not urgent to convert for me.
Julien
Reply to: