Hello Andreas,
> This was not really intended but now it happened. We now need to
> decide about the two options:
>
> 1. Cancel the upload to new and drop the python3-jellyfish package
> 2. Just leave this as is and follow the advise of the jellyfish
> author quoted on top of this mail to the python list[4] to
> rename just the Python module.
>
> I think option 2. is better for all parts and if you agree I'd
> immediately cancel the upload to new.
thanks for the detailed clarification on the events surrounding the
package and the prompt response!
I would be happy to go with either option (personally leaning towards
option 2 as well), and basically rely on your expertise - the upstream
string-jellyfish author has explicitely mentioned that he has no strong
opinion on the Debian package name and I don't have either.
With this in mind, I'm wondering if this would be a good time to rename
this ITP and the RFS (and the mentors package, etc) to the hopefully
final Debian package name ("python-jellyfishstr"?)?
Best regards,
--
Diego M. Rodriguez
36B3 42A9 9F2F 2CFB F79B FF9B B6C4 B901 06BC E232
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature