[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFS: denyhosts-server



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi all,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my package denyhosts-server.


- From the ITP:

- -----

  Package name    : denyhosts-server
  Version         : 2.0.0
  Upstream Author : Jan-Pascal van Best <janpascal@vanbest.org>
  URL             : http://github.com/janpascal/denyhosts_sync
  License         : AGPL-3+
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Denyhosts synchronisation server

denyhosts-server is a server that allows denyhosts clients to share
blocked IP
addresses. It is intended to be a drop-in replacement for the service at
xmlrpc.denyhosts.net that up to now has been provided by the original author
of denyhosts.

This synchronisation server has been written in response to Debian
bug#622697. The existing sync server is not free software, is not going to
be free software (the author has been asked several times) and has been
maintained skimpily over the past 5+ years.

- -----

I've pushed the packaging to
ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/denyhosts-server.git,
but maybe there is a PAPT-specific place to put the packaging? I got the
impression that might
be the same location as the python-modules git repositories?

The package builds cleanly with a pbuilder sid chroot (with the
python-twistar package inserted),
and it is Lintian clean. It uses git-dpm.

Full disclosure: I am also upstream.

I'd appreciate it if one of the more experienced developers from the team
would take a look at the package and I look forward to your comments,
and to working togethers to get this package into Debian.

Kind regards

Jan-Pascal


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=5MED
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: