Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules
On September 26, 2015 at 5:30:35 AM, Paul Wise (pabs@debian.org) wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 19:25 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> > Because the way Python packaging currently is and historically has
> > been, binary packages are not something that is widely available or
> > viable.
>
> Hmm, I thought eggs have been around for ages (seems about 8 years)?
>
Eggs are problematic and hardly anyone publishes them.
-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
Reply to: