[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported



On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:43:53 -0400 Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 10:23:19 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > I would appreciate it if you would go ahead and publish it and then with
> > > your permission, I'll coordinate binNMUs as I've done in the past for
> > > python transitions.
> > 
> > Does https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html look about
> > right? I adjusted the build-depend slightly.
> 
> Yes.  It looks good.  Thanks.
> 
> > There's quite some tangling with g++ stuff at the moment so please hold
> > tight for now. Is it feasible to do rebuild tests in experimental ahead of
> > time?
> 
> I'm currently focusing on the packages that show up as neither good nor bad 
> as they are almost inevitably buggy.  
> 
> Many of the packages that show up as being tangled with g++ actually aren't 
> since they've already been rebuilt and transitioned to testing.  I will, of 
> course, hold off and try and get a better picture of how much overlap there 
> really is.

I've now reviewed the potential for entanglement between doing this python3.5 
transition and the ongoing gcc5 transition.

I reviewed the packages listed on the transition tracker as being affected by 
both transitions, reduced the list down to the packages that have not already 
been explicitly transitioned to a v5 or rebuilt for the transition and then 
examined and/or rebuilt the rest.  None of the remaining packages [1] were 
listed on the titanpad [2] as needing transition nor did rebuilding them show 
any problems that would indicate a delay to the transition nor any gcc5 
transition related issues with the exceptions of pandas and uwsgi, which are 
unbuildable for other reasons [3][4].

I have the python3-defaults upload to enable python3.5 as a supported python3 
version prepared and ready to upload when I get an ack from the release team.

I think we are ready to start.

Scott K

Please CC me on any replies to debian-release as I'm not subscribed.


[1] gyoto, libkdtree++, liblinear, matplotlib, pandas, pykde4, pymia, 
pysubnettree, python-espeak, pyviennacl, uwsgi
[2] https://titanpad.com/UtA5km2wW6
[3] #790024, #790924, and #790925
[4] #788957

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: