Re: Bug #751908, tox, and bin-only Python packages
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:08:35 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Barry Warsaw, 2015-08-06]
> > Should there be a naming convention for Python packages which only provide an
> > executable?
>
> everything that doesn't match python[\d.]*- is fine IMHO.
>
> If "tox" is too generic, use tox-python
If "tox" is too generic, then that would also apply to "/usr/bin/tox"
IMO. (Collisions over command names are even worse than collision over
package names, since they have way more impact on users.)
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@logilab.fr>
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances
Reply to: