Re: python3-aiohttp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Tianon,
On 31 March 2015 16:35:00 BST, Tianon Gravi <admwiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 31 March 2015 at 07:24, Daniel Lintott <daniel@serverb.co.uk> wrote:
>> I can't find an ITP/RFP bug for the package, but see that there are
>some
>> files already in SVN.
>
>I was packaging it originally for something paultag was working on,
>but he no longer needed it so I didn't finish (and it felt like a
>waste to just purge it completely).
>
>Piotr recently expressed some interest (on IRC), but I don't think he
>took it any further after I offered it to him. I'd reiterate what I
>told him though; I'm happy to work on finishing it out more if there's
>some interest in it, but I also won't be sad if someone wants to just
>take over from me (either using my bits or scrapping them entirely and
>starting fresh). I'd point out that it's really close as-is, though.
>:)
Well the software I'm packaging requires aiohttp so there is definitely interest in having it available in Debian!
Personally I don't have time to take the maintenance of aiohttp on myself, so if you're happy to maintain it that would be preferable.
- --
Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=PAF+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: