Re: Packaging review
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the help! I have a question on one bit of lintian4py
output. What should I do with this:
e: python-pyocr: missing-dependency-on-byte-compilation-helper
pycompile => python (>= 2.6.5)
Does this indicate a problem in my Build-Depends on python-all and
python3-all?
Thanks again,
Ross
On 03/22/2014 05:39 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Also, please run lintian4python to inspect your packages. It
> reports some errors, like:
>
> e: python3-pyinsane: pyflakes-undefined-name
> usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyinsane/rawapi.py:62: cmp e:
> python3-pyinsane: pyflakes-undefined-name
> usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyinsane/rawapi.py:425:
> MAX_USERNAME_LEN
>
> -- Dmitry Shachnev
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Dmitry Shachnev
> <mitya57@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ross,
>>
>> I cannot upload your packages, but I had a quick look at them.
>> They mostly look good, but there are minor issues:
>>
>> - Your copyright files don't comply to copyright format 1.0. -
>> The license description should be indented with a space. - You
>> shouldn't refer to symlinks like /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL.
>> - For GPL license, add a longer introduction (see other packages
>> for example). - Please use only one empty line to separate
>> sections in debian/control; - Some packages have tests, but they
>> are not actually run during build (like pyinsane).
>>
>> -- Dmitry Shachnev
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Ross Vandegrift
>> <ross@kallisti.us> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am working on packaging a python application along with its
>>> dependencies. This is my first shot at official Debian
>>> packages, so would appreciate any comments on my work!
>>>
>>> The modules are in the "debian" branches of: python-pocr
>>> https://github.com/rvandegrift/pyocr python-pyinsane
>>> https://github.com/rvandegrift/pyinsane python-nltk
>>> https://github.com/rvandegrift/nltk paperwork
>>> https://github.com/rvandegrift/paperwork
>>>
>>>
>>> NLTK already has had some packaging work in progress - I
>>> haven't heard back from the latest volunteer on it's RFP, so
>>> I'm not sure if that's something I'd hope to submit.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=GD6O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: