Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
* Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>, 2014-01-31, 08:20:
Sandro has orphaned python-concurrent.futures:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736714
Since it is team maintained, I don't think it really makes sense.
Given that he was the only uploader, this makes perfect sense.
Should we just close the bug report and remove Sandro from the
Uploaders field?
No. Policy §5.6.3 reads “if the ‘Maintainer’ control field names a group
of people and a shared email address, the ‘Uploaders’ field must be
present and must contain at least one human with their personal email
address.”
--
Jakub Wilk
Reply to: