Re: Using update-alternatives for /usr/bin provided binaries
On 10/16/2013 02:20 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> I think it's reasonable to get OpenStack to look for python-coverage
> to run it's tests when using a system package. Or use python -m
> coverage. 'coverage' is indeed super generic and the precedent within
> Debian for the package is to call the binary 'python-coverage'.
>
> Is there some reason we can't take that approach?
>
> -Rob
Hi Robert,
If you think this way, as an upstream author, then I have to agree.
Thomas
Reply to: