Re: Source package name suggestion?
On 22 August 2013 16:25, Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> wrote:
> I plan to file an ITP to package the 'q' library:
>
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/q/2.4
>
> 'q' seems like a terrible source package name, so I'll probably pick
> 'python-q' as the spn. Obviously we'll have python-q and python3-q[*] binary
> packages. I just wanted to see if anybody has strong opinions either way.
>
> -Barry
>
> [*] q 2.4 doesn't support Python 3 but there's an upstream issue/pull request
> that adds it and wfm.
I bet it's unrelated to QQ (largest IM network in the world, unless
skype has caught up after merging MSN).
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
Reply to: