[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer



On Friday, May 17, 2013 01:33:38 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 05/17/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> > This came up recently on debian-python. It's a very long thread, but the
> > basic outcome was that, while quite a few people wanted to move away from
> > svn, there was very little consensus on which VCS to migrate to, whether
> > to
> > include full source tarballs, and how to do any migration. It was
> > suggested
> > that if someone was willing to put the time in to drive a migration, that
> > might be OK, but by then the discussion had pretty much killed all
> > enthusiasm for it.
> > 
> > My memory is that there was also disagreement over whether the team could
> > live with packages split across two difference VCSs. Some people argued
> > that the teams packages should be unified, others that a migration would
> > be
> > easier if it didn't need to be all-at-once. Some other packaging teams
> > (e.g. Games) do have packages in two VCSs.
> > 
> > Here's the start of that thread, if you've got time to read through it
> > all:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2013/02/msg00032.html
> 
> thanks for the link.  I am willing to drive the migration for
> python-apps (PAPT); i will target moving all of the packages to git, and
> i will include upstream tarballs.  I will use tools and scripts that i
> will document and i will document my work so that other python-related
> teams can take advantage of my effort.
> 
> If the PAPT team wants to bless this effort by creating a tree of git
> repositories that i can stage this transition into, that is fine by me.
>  If not, i will stage these transitions directly into the collab-maint
> tree of git repos (as i have already done with trac), and then people
> can decide whether they want to move them into some hypothetical PAPT
> tree of git repos whenever the PAPT team gets around to making that
> decision.
> 
> Which would folks prefer?

If the team moves to full source git archives, I'll just drop the team from 
all the packages I maintain.

Scott K

P.S.  See, now the fun begins.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: