Re: On robustness of maintainer scripts

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On robustness of maintainer scripts
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 22:55:08 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20130512205508.GB2539@jwilk.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-python@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] A2A20EC3B8560D408356CAC2FC148E5358E901CA@SUN-DAG1.synchrotron-soleil.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20130509224106.GA6645@jwilk.net> <[🔎] A2A20EC3B8560D408356CAC2FC148E5358E901CA@SUN-DAG1.synchrotron-soleil.fr>

* PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>, 2013-05-12, 08:22:

prerm
=====
...
Real-world failure: #706758


should I reassign this bug to python ?

I think so. (But maybe there's flaw a in my reasoning. Please shout youif this is the case. :P)


--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

References:
- On robustness of maintainer scripts
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
- RE : On robustness of maintainer scripts
  - From: PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: On robustness of maintainer scripts
Next by Date: Re: On robustness of maintainer scripts
Previous by thread: RE : On robustness of maintainer scripts
Next by thread: Re: On robustness of maintainer scripts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread