Re: RFS: bunch, kitchen, grapefruit, fabulous, stomper, txws, txzmq, moksha.common, moksha.hub
* Simon Chopin <chopin.simon@gmail.com>, 2013-05-07, 20:04:
(or RFR, for Jakub :P)
Oh hi!
fabulous: Makes your terminal output totally fabulous
fabulous/fonts/cmr10.ttf license doesn't look free to me.
I see this in debian/patches/build_xterm256_ext:
- library = expanduser('~/.xterm256.so')
+ library = '/usr/share/lib/xtermspeedup.so'
Errr, /usr/share/lib/?
I don't see a point of making fabulous-xtermspeedup a separate package.
It's tiny, and doesn't bring any extra dependencies.
The package FTBFS when I build only arch-dependent packages:
| dh_sphinxdoc -a
| dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found
| make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
If I were the maintainer, I would remove (with a Debian-specific patch)
this junk from setup.py:
| from ez_setup import use_setuptools
| use_setuptools(version='0.6c11')
lintian4python emits (among others):
x: python-fabulous: except-without-exception-type usr/share/pyshared/fabulous/logs.py:86
x: python-fabulous: except-without-exception-type usr/share/pyshared/fabulous/utils.py:95
x: python-fabulous: except-without-exception-type usr/share/pyshared/fabulous/xterm256.py:104
(the first one is false-positive, but the others are not.)
--
Jakub Wilk
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Re: Upload of python-mock 1.0.1 to Debian unstable
- Next by Date:
Re: RFS: bunch, kitchen, grapefruit, fabulous, stomper, txws, txzmq, moksha.common, moksha.hub
- Previous by thread:
RFS: bunch, kitchen, grapefruit, fabulous, stomper, txws, txzmq, moksha.common, moksha.hub
- Next by thread:
Re: RFS: bunch, kitchen, grapefruit, fabulous, stomper, txws, txzmq, moksha.common, moksha.hub
- Index(es):