[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFR: python-qrcode -- native python module to generate QR codes



Am 13.04.2013 05:46, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
> On 02/21/2013 03:34 PM, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
>> Am 21.02.2013 20:42, schrieb Jakub Wilk:
>>> * Cornelius Kölbel <cornelius.koelbel@lsexperts.de>, 2013-02-21, 20:14:
>>>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qrcode/qrcode_2.4.2-1.dsc
>>>> Great. The mentors site suddenly gives me lintian warnings, that were
>>>> not there earlier and that did give the linitan on my debian
>>>> experimental. :-(
>>> There's only one lintian warning:
>>>
>>> W: qrcode source: debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (>=
>>> 7.0.50~)
>>>
>>> This tag was been retired in Lintian 2.5.11, because stable has a
>>> newer debhelper version, and oldstable is not supported anymore. (I
>>> would have preferred if the tag was made pedantic rather than removed,
>>> but oh well...)
>>>
>>> The remaining tags are informative:
>>>
>>> I: qrcode source: quilt-patch-missing-description add-man-page
>>> I: python-qrcode: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/qr.1.gz:7
>>> I: python-qrcode: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/qr.1.gz:13
>>> I: python-qrcode: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/qr.1.gz:19
>>>
>> Anyway.
>> ...and again I upload a hopefully again nicer version.
>> I hope the next package will be less complicated...
> I'm interesting in sponsoring this package and uploading it, if no one else
> has claimed it.  Cornelius, do you have a git or svn repo for this package
> yet?  If not, I can set up a git repo on collab-maint.
>
> .hc
>
Hello Hans-Christoph,

to my knowledge till now noone has claimed the package.
So I would very much appreciate, if you would sponsor this package.

There is the git repo of the upstream package, which is located here:

https://github.com/lincolnloop/python-qrcode

As part of an internal git I have my addons (Makefile to download, patch
and build the package) in this repository.
So if this should be in a public git, we should move it there, yes, thanks!

There is one thing for me to do:
The upstream was updated to 2.5.1, and I would have to build a new
package from this.

Thanks a lot and kind regards
Cornelius


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: