On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:13:02AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I will be direct. Thanks! I really appreciate. > So far, the solicitation has been for co-maintainers with morph. I think it > would only be fair to make a similar call for co-maintainers with doko. ... but hold right there :-) If that is what you perceived from what _I_ wrote, I should make clear that it was not my intention. The first call for volunteers I've sent on this list was meant to be neutral. I really wanted to know who is *potentially* interested to co-maintain pythonX.Y in *some* team. I've never meant to imply "forced" co-maintenance among all the people who volunteer, let alone co-maintenance specifically with someone. In my intention, a broad call for volunteers was just a first step before a second one during which incompatibilities among the people who volunteered should have been identified (I didn't make that explicit before simply because that step might be unneeded --- e.g. if a single person had volunteered :-P). So, if anyone did not volunteer due to the fact that others did, please reconsider. Similarly, it would be helpful to do what Scott has just done: clarifying what the incompatibilities among the (potential) volunteers are. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o . Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature