On Jul 01, 2011, at 01:00 AM, Mitar wrote: >I will not yet use "dh" as it looks too magical for me for now. I >would like to understand what is happening. And first have a working >package. Then I can play with cleaning it up. Or would it be easier to >just let dh do everything? I doubt it can be magical enough. Personally, I find dh preferable, even with the magical aspects. You can always set DH_VERBOSE=1 to get decent output about exactly what it's doing. I think dh and dh_python2 make a great way to very easily package up most Python libraries. I have some recommendations to add for extension modules coming soon to the dh_python2 transition wiki page. -Barry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature