Re: Bug#620173: RFP: creepy -- A geolocation information aggregator
On 03/30/2011 08:42 PM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:33:06PM +0200, Yiannis Kakavas wrote:
>> I admit I didn't pay much attention to formality, aiming at
>> functionality as soon as possible, but I guess the changes needed to
>> conform to debian policy are not that many. Currently lintian outputs
>> these warnings
>>
>> W: creepy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/postinst
>> W: creepy source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.1)
>> W: creepy: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 1
>> W: creepy: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l94:#nnnn
>> W: creepy: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/creepymap
>>
>> and also there is the matter of how python applications should be
>> packaged in debian ( currently I use python-support )
>
> So I am relatively ignorant of the Python policies, but I believe
> that easy_install in the postinst is a no-no.
>
> Could someone please correct me or elaborate?
>
python-tweepy recently was changed from ITP to RFP ( Bug#581602 ), if
there is interest from someone to take over that would be great.
>> I'd be more than happy to help in any way
>
> Great news.
Reply to: