On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:15:39PM +0100, Jan Dittberner wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 01:33:45PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Mar 06, 2011, at 05:43 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > >Do the 2 VCDs you mentioned have clear advantage that make then > > >preferible to git except being Python-based? If so, I think it's a > > >quite weak reason. > > Let me turn that around: why would you *not* want to use a Python based dVCS? > > <wink> > I think Debian package maintainer tool support should be considered. > > One reason could be that git is the de-facto standard for Debian. I guess > > choice of dVCS is the editor-wars of the 2010s, and probably just as silly. > Is there a mature git-buildpackage replacement for mercurial or bazaar? bzr-builddeb is IME much /more/ mature than git-buildpackage. > There is a mercurial-buildpackage but I don't know how feature complete/ > comparable to git-buildpackage or svn-buildpackage it is. > How well does debcommit work with mercurial or bazaar? debcommit works perfectly well in bazaar. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature