Re: Will DPMT be ok maintaining a package that could potentially build other language bindings?
- To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Will DPMT be ok maintaining a package that could potentially build other language bindings?
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 23:32:10 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4C5DD0DA.1000601@bzed.de>
- In-reply-to: <20100730114753.12299deb@heresy>
- References: <35A4EE6E-E98F-426C-88EE-F6C50213A839@ubuntu.com> <4C5D1920-A4E3-48EC-B7FD-7443211796F0@ubuntu.com> <20100730114753.12299deb@heresy>
On 07/30/2010 05:47 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 07:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> [bump]
>>
>> Anybody?
>
> I have little street cred to speak for DPMT, but I would be hesitant about
> it. I personally have little Ruby or Lua experience and wouldn't know how to
> fix problems in those bindings.
>
> OTOH, I don't have a better suggestion. :(
The real proper suggest is to put it into collab-maint.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: