[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Will DPMT be ok maintaining a package that could potentially build other language bindings?



On Jul 30, 2010, at 07:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:

>[bump]
>
>Anybody?

I have little street cred to speak for DPMT, but I would be hesitant about
it.  I personally have little Ruby or Lua experience and wouldn't know how to
fix problems in those bindings.

OTOH, I don't have a better suggestion. :(

-Barry

>On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:37 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> So I recently uploaded python-libgearman into the svn repository,
>> but bzed pointed out that it didn't build from the swig bindings,
>> and so really wasn't acceptable to upload to Debian.
>> 
>> I agree, and now I have a source package that builds from the
>> upstream swig sources, but this begs the question as to whether or
>> not DPMT wants to maintain something that, long term, should also
>> build lua and ruby bindings.
>> 
>> Here is the branch with the packaging in it:
>> 
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+junk/gearman-interface-packaging
>> 
>> If it seems ok and DPMT doesn't mind having it in the repository
>> when we add ruby/lua bindings, then I'll check it in, otherwise I
>> will seek more broad sponsorship for the package.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> -Clint
>> 
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>> listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive:
>> 35A4EE6E-E98F-426C-88EE-F6C50213A839@ubuntu.com">http://lists.debian.org/35A4EE6E-E98F-426C-88EE-F6C50213A839@ubuntu.com
>> 
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: