On Jul 27, 2010, at 09:48 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: >well, both "setup.py test" and "module.test()" sound like reasonable >interfaces to adhere to. Yes, especially if 'python -m module.test' were an available command line interface. The former could be promoted for in-development testing and the latter could be promoted for deployed package testing (i.e. where you wouldn't have a setup.py). Probably the best place to continue discussing this is in the TIP mailing list, except perhaps as it applies specifically to Debian. -Barry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature