Le mercredi 14 juillet 2010 à 17:17 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit : > On 07/13/2010 08:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet > > 2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> disait : > > > >>> I'm working on package that uses CDBS > > > >> That's not a very good choice. > > > > Why? > > Because cdbs is an unmaintainable beast of Makefiles. I don’t like makefile hackery either, but cdbs has done a pretty decent job over the years, and is still maintained. For example, support for autotools Python packages has been recently added - and this is something that dh can’t do. I think there are more urgent matters to settle than picking over a developer’s build system choice. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part