Il giorno Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:15:46 -0400 Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> ha scritto: > I have consulted with Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) and Jakub Wilk (jwilk), who > did most of the analysis for the last two Python transitions (Adding 2.6 to > supported versions and the current transition to 2.6 as default) and neither > of them found this embedded information useful in their analysis. They did > their work based on package dependencies. I conducted my analysis in order to provide binNMUs for python2.6 as supported version using the method explained at [1]. Fields were used only marginally to exclude some false positives, most of the job was done by looking at package content, generated by helpers rather than XS-P-V or equivalent. Those could be completely ignored in case a stricted dependency had been in place (e.g. python (<< 2.6)). [1] <20100123201506.35c9d27f@utumno> -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org> `. `' `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature