Il giorno mar, 02/03/2010 alle 16.21 +0100, Sandro Tosi ha scritto: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 16:13, Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> wrote: > > > > For the packages > > with low users count it becomes more important since it becomes unlikely > > that an important bug would get detected that rapidly.... So.... > > lets switch to 2.6 now so we have more time! > > Exactly my point. > As a very minor maintainer of few very minor python packages, I just want to say "me too". [The reason why I dare writing this email is that there are _a certain number_ of very minor maintainers of very minor python packages, whose lifes do not orbit mainly Debian, and I'd like to spare (to me and) to those other non-gurus, with few users that do the testing, and even less that test non-default configurations, the rush on important bugs - kept hidden until the last moment in the name of the "stability of unstable" principle. When I volunteered to take the responsability of maintaining my packages in shape, I didn't just choose Debian as a random hosting to upload them to: I made an implicit deal with the Debian rules, among which figure the specific releases mechanisms, which someone else in this case has the responsability of keeping running. Well, in [0] I can still read "Use it at your own risk!".] Regards, Pietro [0]: http://www.debian.org/releases/unstable/index.en.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente