(filtering out some of the interested mailing lists)
* 2009-06-23 20:19, Erik Rose wrote:
> I'm sad to see Plone support go, as I have a lot of reservations about
> how Plone is distributed these days.
FWIW, I'm sad too and I share your same reservations about how Plone is
distributed.
> Actually not; it works in 2.5 and 2.6. 2.4 is unsupported by 2.12,
> though it "should work".
> http://docs.zope.org/zope2/releases/2.12/WHATSNEW.html#support-for-newer-python-versions
My fault, I wanted to write 2.11 (which is the current stable release,
as today). Sorry for the wrong number.
> Were you aware that we've renumbered the releases and inserted a less
> ambitious Plone 4, which should be in beta by the end of the year? It
> will run on (and require) Zope 2.12. Plone is finally joining the modern
> Python world. :-)
I don't exclude to support Zope 2.x again in Debian and Ubuntu, but I
really think that in this moment dropping the packages is the best
solution: we will finally be able to drop python2.4.
For Plone, after 5 years of maintenance in Debian, I'm sure that *not*
having an official package (eg. included in Debian stable) is the best
option for our users.
--
Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org> .''`.
Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user. : :' :
`. `'`
http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `-
_____________________________________________________________________
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature