Re: will 2.6 be default?

[qwavel <tmm@fastmail.fm>]

Akira Kitada wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Nicolas Chauvat
> <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> wrote:
>>
>> It would indeed be nice if someone could list the hurdles that stand
>> between us and Python 2.6 in Squeeze, or point us to the web page that
>> lists them.
>>
>> Python2.6 is in experimental:
>> http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/python2.6
>> Python2.6 is in Ubuntu jaunty:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-May/028266.html
>>
>> Has anything changed since:
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/03/msg00091.html
>> and:
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/08/msg00003.html
>> ?
>>
>> I read the list and can search the archives, but have not found a list
>> of tasks that need doing to get 2.6 in squeeze.
> 
> I heard from Josselin Mouette that he will post an analysis of which
> packages need updating soon.
> 

Thanks for updating this thread with that new information.

I think it would be great if Python 2.6 (and maybe even 3.1) could be part
of Squeeze.  Whether 2.5 or 2.6 are the default is less important then just
getting 2.6 in.




-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/will-2.6-be-default--tp25148532p25416318.html
Sent from the debian-python mailing list archive at Nabble.com.