Tristan Seligmann wrote: > Well, fair enough; I suppose the README.Debian note should not be quite > as explicit as I made it. I'm just not very happy with the gratuitous > (in my view) change to the upstream tarball, so I wanted to be as clear > about it as I could for anyone else wondering why it didn't match the > released tarball. If it were up to me, I wouldn't be making this change > at all, but it seems the alternative is to release lenny without > quodlibet, which is not very satisfactory either. There has never been a clear explaination in #477454 as to why the bug should be considered RC at all, or why, if it is RC, it would require modification of the upstream tarball to fix. There have been vague mutterings about the content being illegal in germany; I've already pointed out in the bug log several other instances of personal insults included in Debian packages. If the people who think this is illegal in germany, and that Debian should censor such speech think this bug is RC, they need to begin a comprensive audit and mass RC bug filing on all the other packages too. (They might also find certian such insults on the Debian mailing lists..) -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature