Re: Bug#457473: ITP: extended_threading -- Extension of the python threading api

["Sandro Tosi" <matrixhasu@gmail.com>]

let's continue this on d-{devel,python}

On Dec 22, 2007 8:50 PM, Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es> wrote:
> * Julien Cristau [Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:41:37 +0100]:
>
> > Why not use the same name for both?  I think it'd be clearer, and
> > has no drawbacks afaics.
>
> +1. I personally dislike so many python modules "suffering" from this.

and

> > Why not use the same name for both?  I think it'd be clearer, and
> > has no drawbacks afaics.
>
> On Debian Python Modules Team requested me not to change source
> package name from upstream name if not strictly necessary. I'd call
> them both the same (it's clearer for me too) if was not for that
> advice.

I'd like to have source and binary package name the same (thuogh I
understand it's not needed to have source package renamed from
upstream one), but that would be linear (for me).

Thanks,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/