Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 00:06 +0100, Thomas Jollans a écrit : > There is also the option of only having one in the distribution, which should > be PySyck for having more features. This would mean chucking the official > binding out of debian, which I am not entirely comfortable with either. If it is compatible with the official bindings and has more features, this sounds like the way to go, although it also depends on upstream plans for python-syck. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=