Le jeu 15 juin 2006 00:00, Peter Samuelson a écrit : > unblock 373387 by 373628 > thanks > > (This block was a false positive. While we use cdbs a little, we > don't actually use it for anything python-related.) > > First, it's not clear to me what advantages anyone would get from > "fixing" the subversion packaging to comply with current python > policy. I do not see what is broken about our current package. It > doesn't hard-code python 2.3 anywhere, so it's binNMUable. (Well, > other than the "Provides: python2.3-subversion", which can probably > go away now. It's left over from renaming the package from that.) > > It's even less clear what point there is in supporting multiple > simultaneous python versions, except to avoid the need for a binNMU > once every 3 years. python-subversion has very few users. Building > the module code twice, and making the package hard to backport to > stable, is enough of a pain to make it reasonable to ask what benefit > these users will get in return. please follow-up on debian-python@ -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgptFe19ET5Ds.pgp
Description: PGP signature