Re: Coordinated effort to update python packages
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:43:32PM -0600, Jed Frechette wrote:
> This is exactly the situation I am in now. I want to use PyX for
> plotting but I need some of the features in Python 2.4. Well I
> probably don't need them, I am sure I could find work arounds, but why
> should I write code that is more complicated than necessary just so I
> can use a version of the language that was replaced almost 2 years
> old? So yes, in the real world users may need/want to use a version of
> Python other than the default version.
Since it seems to be the best idea, I've decided to support all of the
standard Python versions in PyX (again), so this should be fixed when I
make the next upload.
> By the way, I was able to use the Python 2.3 PyX modules by simply
> adding them to my PYTHONPATH. So far this seems to be working fine.
Yeah, the PyX module is mostly just regular Python code.
--
gram
Reply to: