Re: .egg in Debian summary?
Bob Tanner <tanner <at> real-time.com> writes:
> >> I don't think Debian should use the egg structure.
> Read and re-read the complete thread regarding .eggs in Debian and I cannot
> tell if any progress has been made.
> As "just a package maintainer" I was looking for the "options" to move
> forward.
> 1. Do nothing, go with the status quo as documented in the Debian python
> policy, which is no .egg's and unpackage everything into a sub-directory of
> site-packages.
>
> 2. Investigate easydeb <http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/easydeb/>
>
> 3. Using Phillip's .egg-info solution
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel/2567>
>
> Any others?
Re-approaching this topic. I'm still trying to get TurboGears (TG) packages
and it requires .egg support.
Any progress on the technical direction Debian will take regarding .eggs?
Reply to: