On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 23:02 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 02 février 2006 à 21:09 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > Josselin Mouette writes: > > > There is still a situation we can improve easily, though: private > > > modules. Currently, they have to migrate with python transitions, and > > > this is only because of byte-compilation. The python-support way of > > > doing things should still be fine for them, and it can reduce the number > > > of packages to migrate at once, without complicating anyone's work. > > > > that is, packages with private modules but without extension modules > > and no modules in /usr/lib/python2.x. how many packages are this? > > A first estimation by grepping through Contents-i386.gz gives 297 > packages. It certainly includes a lot of false positives, but gives the > order of magnitude. This sounds far too high. Are you including packages with private .py files that are not modules? This is common, and one of the reasons I said it was hard to gauge. -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@sacredchao.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part