Re: Upload of new Python extension packages
Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 16:49 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> > Please, don't use the python2.X-foo scheme for such a small package. You
> > only need a single python-foo package, built against the default python
> > version. It eases transitions a lot, and avoids unnecessary cluttering
> > the archive.
>
> And should pure-python modules go into /usr/lib/site-python, or
> /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages?
That doesn't really matter. Even if they go to /usr/lib/site-python, the
package has to be updated at the python transition, because of the .pyc
and .pyo files. The solution is to finally use or rewrite that
python-central stuff.
Anyway, pure-python packages are a minority, so this isn't the most
important issue.
> There are still quite a few things that need fixing in the policy...
Yes. We have to fix it before the transition, IMHO.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss@debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Reply to: