Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 22:24 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : [...] > 3. In most cases, they are useless. The python policy allows such > packages for cases where a specific python version is required > by a reverse dependencies. However, it should have been the > exception and not the rule. > > If people on this list agree, I'd like to submit a mass bug filing to > -devel. +1. But if it's done, I think the Debian Python Policy should be modified to be less permissive about the python package that are accepted/kept into the archive. We don't want to open a python package hunting season every year. -- Cédric Delfosse, http://cdelfosse.free.fr Jabber ID: cedric@jabber.debian.net Get a free backup server: http://lrs.linbox.org ! Linbox: http://linbox.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part