On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:54:43PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 20:44, Graham Wilson wrote: > > This is the solution I use with the PyX package is to create a > > python-pyx-common package that both of the versioned packages depend on. > > This works fine for PyX, since the -common package just cotains > > read-only data files. I am not sure how well it would work for > > Albatross. > > I assume python-pyx-common doesn't include any python source code then. No, it doesn't. Just data files. > I think I'll do this for python-albatross as well. It'll be a really > tiny package but at least it'll fix the issue of not being able to > install both python 2.2 and 2.3 versions. Does it make sense to have both versions installed? Why might someone want to do that? -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature