On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 23:16, David M. Cooke wrote: > What's the word on making the default version of python to be 2.3 > instead of 2.2, now that 2.3 is released? IMO maintainers should start compiling/packaging their modules for it before any transition of the 'python' package happens. This seems to be trivial in at least some cases, where I've been using 2.3-based packages for a while (pygame, most notably. This seems to be already done in most cases, although it's not in the case that matters most to me :) (Pygame, #202805). A glance at apt-cache search's output indicates that the vast majority are ready, though. -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part