Re: re (no) bugs

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: re (no) bugs
From: Kai Hendry <hendry@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:51:20 +0200
Message-id: <20021110115120.GB2226@cs.helsinki.fi>
Mail-followup-to: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: Kai Hendry <hendry@cs.helsinki.fi>
In-reply-to: <20021110111119.GA533@frobozz.local>
References: <20021110105536.GA2226@cs.helsinki.fi> <20021110111119.GA533@frobozz.local>

Arg! Yes there is a rogue re.pyc in there.  

It was very very dangerous(yes, and silly) to name my initial re
experimentation file re.py.

Sorry for wasting your time,
-Kai

On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:11:19PM +1100, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> Is there a file called "re.pyc" in the same directory as test.py?  If so,
> was it possibly generated by a newer Python than the one that produced this
> traceback?

Reply to:

References:
- re bugs
  - From: Kai Hendry <hendry@cs.helsinki.fi>
- Re: re bugs
  - From: Andrew Bennetts <andrew-debpython@puzzling.org>

Prev by Date: Re: re bugs
Next by Date: experimental zope packages.
Previous by thread: Re: re bugs
Next by thread: experimental zope packages.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread