[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what to do about python-kjbuckets



On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 05:23:30PM +0100, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
[...]
> But there is a problem: The current (from 1997) upstream version[1]
> doesn't work with Python >= 2.0.  Now, Berthold Hoellmann, Oleg
> Broytmann and others have ported[2] kjbuckets to work with newer
> Pythons, but it's not as official as one could hope.  For instance,
> the version number is still the same as the old upstream version
> (2.2).
> 
> I'm not sure what to do.  Here's a couple of solutions:
[...]
> 2) Only make a python1.5-kjbuckets package.  (Nah.)
[...]
> 5) Use date in version, i.e. 2.2.port.20011104 or similar.  (Best
>    solution I can come up with.)
[...]

I would hope that you also make a python1.5-kjbuckets so that older
python1.5 programs that used it can still use it. You them also make a
python2.2-kjbuckets (2.2.0-port.20011104) package if you want something
newer.

If you want to support the default python, you need a python2.1-kjbuckets
and an empty python-kjbuckets package that has "Depends: python (>=2.1),
python (<<2.2), python2.1-kjbuckets". Or you could wait untill 2.2 becomes
the default python...

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ABO: finger abo@minkirri.apana.org.au for more info, including pgp key
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: