On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:28:58AM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Hrm. That doesn't seem to make sense. For example, Python 2.1 supports
> > the Python 2.0 API completely, and Python 2.2 supports the Python 2.1
> > API completely too, doesn't it?
> API in this context means binary API. Only Python 2.1.X supports the
> 2.1 API.
> The point is probably moot anyhow since I've almost finished creating
> packages using the scheme proposed by Donavon and others. I need to
> update the policy and doing some more testing yet though.
Which scheme was that?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
"Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue."
-- Mike Hoye,
see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
Attachment:
pgp2VsmK4L9aU.pgp
Description: PGP signature