[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DPN 2020/01 Frozen: Please review and translate

Holger Wansing wrote:
> I have already pushed a proofreading changes commit.


> Additional comments:
> 1. 
> The 'Newcomer bugs' section was existing two times in this DPN.
> Was this intended? 
> The first occurrence has at least an outdated number of open bugs.
> I have commented out the first section for now. Feel free to revert this
> change, if you think different.

This was probably an oversight.  I missed it myself in my first pass.
> 2.
> In the section about manpage translations, there is a sentence I don't 
> understand. Maybe you want to rework this?
> "Others may
> want to join this package, but they are no longer maintained, so an important
> effort is needed first to convert them into PO files and update."
> What is "no longer maintained"?

Is it talking about translators who may want to bring existing l10n
packages (in other languages or perhaps for other software) under the
manpages-l10n umbrella?  I've amended it on this assumption to:

 [...] Others may
 want to join this effort, but where packages are no longer maintained it is important
 first to convert them into PO files and update.</p>

At the start of that paragraph I also rephrased

 Historically the man pages have been in one package, but translated in
 various packages according to the language, using different methods, [...]

(which seems to be claiming that *all* man pages are in one .deb) as

 Historically, man pages for a given package have often had translations provided in
 various other packages, using different methods, [...]

which I think is what it's trying to say.
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package

Reply to: