[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Hulu support for jessie and future linux distributions.


You have contacted the Debian Publicity team responsible for the media,
press, and publicity of the project.

As such we do not offer any user support.

Please contact one of the Debian user support channels for help:
*  https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/

Best regards,

Donald Norwood

(Credit to Paul Wise)

On 09/11/2015 08:29 PM, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> You'll have to forgive me I'm unable to communicate clearly most of the time.
> Back in September ~13 Hulu stopped working and there was a simple work
> around, the following javascript bookmark cased an old player to be
> loaded.  The old player has since been upgraded leaving no way that I
> know to play Hulu.  The flashplugin requires an older version of
> hal(known as the hal hack) to play Hulu and it's not a possibility as
> new hal versions are depended on by other pkgs.
> javascript:function getURL() { var links =
> document.getElementsByTagName("link"); for (var i=0; i < links.length;
> i++) { if (links[i].getAttribute("rel") == "media:video") { return
> links[i].getAttribute("href"); } } return ""; } function main() {
> window.open(getURL()); } main();
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mike Mestnik <cheako@mikemestnik.net>
> Date: Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:19 PM
> Subject: Hulu support for jessie and future linux distributions.
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Hulu?
> http://www.hulu.com/embed.html?eid=MSsiYiNS2_ix0dgvIz5N2w  error 3336.
> Using some javascript bookmark was the workaround, that reveals uris
> like the above.
> Using Debian Jessie Chromium/peperflash.
> ice-weasel has a bug where the binary flash-plugin can't link against
> a newer, now dependent, hal library.  Resulting in a 2203 error code,
> lower numbers appear to indicate and earlier position in the code.
> This bug is in the flash-plugin, regardless of what browser loads it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: