[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Project News 2010/12 frozen. Please review and translate



On 2010-09-19 05:05, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi!

We just finished the last bits for the latest issue of the Debian Project
News to be release on Wednesday.  I would appreciate reviews and
translations.
Thank you Alexander. Here are my remarks:

Linux Mint, a Linux distribution whose purpose is to <q>produce a
modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both
powerful and easy to use</q>, has released an edition based on Debian.
This new Linux Mint distribution will track Debian testing, as
a more reliable upstream base. Linux Mint appears
to be a popular Linux distribution ranking highly at DistroWatch.com as
well as other non-scientific measures. Certainly they received a large
number of comments to their <a
href=""http://www.linuxmint.com/blog/?p=1527">http://www.linuxmint.com/blog/?p=1527">blog post</a>
regarding their new 
distribution. Anecdotal evidence seems to point to this Debian-based
edition as a popular move. </p>
<p>The addition of Linux Mint to the Debian derivatives family is a
welcome one, and should the Linux Mint developers wish to be in
contact with Debian it has been suggested that they will be warmly welcomed
at the <a href=""http://wiki.debian.org/DerivativesFrontDesk">http://wiki.debian.org/DerivativesFrontDesk">Debian
Derivatives Front Desk</a>.
This section sounds a little strange. Is there any reason to suggest the Linux Mint developers not be warmly welcomed?...
"they" is used to refer to "a Linux distribution".

Andreas Tille began a <a
href=""http://lists.debian.org/20100909094049.GB4649">http://lists.debian.org/20100909094049.GB4649@an3as.eu">short
discussion</a> regarding bugs which are not
grave software bugs <em>per se</em>, but could cause grave harm to life or
property under certain conditions. As an example, the bug in question
involved improper data handling that could lead to a medical patient
being prescribed medicine which could lead to a possibly fatal
reaction. Responses from developers indicated that despite such bugs
not being explicitly mentioned in the bug guidelines, they should
already fall under release-critical severity and thus should have
freeze exceptions and possible Debian Security Advisories if needed.
The fix for the bug in question was approved for testing within the
day.
Ahem. Life-threatening software bugs are not grave bugs per se?

Besides some internal discussion
(e.g. monitoring and configuration management), this also lead to a <a
href=""http://lists.debian.org/20100906170305.GQ25990">http://lists.debian.org/20100906170305.GQ25990@anguilla.noreply.org">procedure
for the handling of guest accounts on debian.org machines</a>.
I suppose "lead" should read "led".

Rapha&euml;l Hertzog <a
href=""http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/09/can-debian-achieve-world-domination-without-being-on-facebook/">http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/09/can-debian-achieve-world-domination-without-being-on-facebook/">wondered</a>
whether the Debian project shouldn't have an official page on
some non-free micro-blogging service. Stefano Zacchiroli <a
href=""http://upsilon.cc/%7Ezack/blog/posts/2010/09/yes_we_can/">http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2010/09/yes_we_can/">disagreed<a>
on the grounds that it would not be possible to use a proprietary service without
endorsing it.
I don't see the blog post discussing a non-free micro-blogging service. It seems to talk only about Facebook, which is not a blogging service AFAIK.

Christian Perrier addressed his <a
href=""http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2010/09/12#release-team">http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2010/09/12#release-team">thanks
to the release team</a> and encouraged every developer, whether their
package is unblocked or not, to send private <q>thank you</q>
messages to any Release Team member for their amazing work.
I doubt it's reasonable to call the release team's work "amazing" from a neutral point of view.

FTP Master Joerg Jaspert, in a <a
href=""http://lists.debian.org/87wrqkjrkl.fsf">http://lists.debian.org/87wrqkjrkl.fsf@gkar.ganneff.de">short
minute from the FTP Master meeting</a> being held this weekend,
welcomed Torsten Werner to the team.
Torsten was already member of the archive maintenance team, he just became "FTP master".

Lucas Nussbaum <a href =""http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=571">http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=571">added</a>
a <a href =""http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs.cgi">http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs.cgi">bugs search interface</a>
to the <a href =""http://udd.debian.org/">http://udd.debian.org/">Ultimate Debian Database</a>. 

It thus may replace the <a
href=""http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php">http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php">unofficial release-critical
bugs tracker</a>, while providing many more feature requests.
I hope this should read more features, not more feature requests!

According to the <a href=""http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php">http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php">unofficial
	release-critical bug counter</a>, the upcoming release,
	Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q>, is currently affected by
317 release-critical bugs.
The high number is way off, it's currently 261.

Reply to: